Sunday, March 25, 2018

A RADICAL SUGGESTION FOR DETERRING SCHOOL SHOOTINGS


I started this essay off with one point in mind, but as I wrote and researched it, another point made itself evident to me. I have found what I believe to be a previously-undiscovered method of deterring school shootings. I’ll first talk about the methods which have been bandied about in the press recently, and then I’ll disclose the new method of deterring school shootings which I have discovered.

What measures will best deter mass mayhem at schools? If by some form of magic, you could make all the guns in America disappear overnight, those determined to wreak havoc on schools would be deterred, but they would quickly turn to other means—like home made bombs, for instance. As Timothy McVeigh and the Austin bomber demonstrated, bombs are easily made from common ingredients. The worst mass killing at a school in American history was a bombing, not a shooting.
Someone determined to kill can inflict a lot of damage with something as low tech as a knife, as was done in the Franklin Regional school stabbing in 2014 which injured 27. The nightmare low-tech weapon for such a mass attack would probably be a katana, a saber, or even a machete. Killing sprees using swords were at one time common in some cultures, which gave us the term “running amok,” or “running amuck.” The DSM‑5 actually classifies “amok” as a form of dissociative disorder. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Abnormal and Clinical Psychology, 1:161.

Banning certain types of firearms will probably do as little to deter school shootings as Prohibition did to deter drunkenness. Under Prohibition, those who could live without drinking didn’t get drunk; but those who couldn’t live without drinking found a way. Banning the sale of AR-15’s and AK-47’s would do little to nothing about those guns already in circulation. Outlawing those guns in circulation will simply drive them underground, and a determined criminal will get access to such a gun anyhow. Assuming you could successfully ban all modern firearms, one who was intent on mass murder could simply gun up with half a dozen cap-and-ball revolvers as did William Quantrill and Bloody Bill Anderson. A half-way competent machinist can build a firearm. I actually prosecuted a murder case where a man killed his wife with a gun he made from cast iron pipe. It shot a finishing nail punch which was ½” in diameter, and he thought it would be untraceable. As things turned out, it was easily traceable to his workshop, where we found all the ingredients.

I have suggested in previous posts that enhanced mental health screening would be the best method of identifying and neutralizing the threat from potential mass-shooters, and Florida’s recently-passed Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety Act makes a valiant effort in that direction. The part of the act of which I was most skeptical was the provision for “arming teachers.” No offense to anyone, but as I recall my high school days, I wouldn’t trust most of my high school teachers with loaded firearms. (Especially the one who used to talk about lining his students up in front of a brick wall and machine gunning them). I was afraid that the act would simply provide for passing out guns to teachers as though they were passing out party favors. Reading the act has calmed my fears. The vetting, training, and retraining process that the act requires before allowing a non-law-enforcement school employee to go armed is rigorous. I think they ought to require all school resource officers to go through the same process as outlined in the act.

As was shown only recently in Maryland, an armed school security officer who is willing to confront a school shooter rather than stand outside the school counting his change while the shooting is in progress is the surest way to stop a school shooting. This was by no means an isolated incident, but when such incidents occur, they get downplayed. When an Arapaho County school shooter became aware that a deputy sheriff was coming to confront him, he committed suicide rather than face the deputy. Snopes.com questioned whether the imminent arrival of the deputy saved lives, saying that it was a “speculative notion” that imminent arrival of an armed officer hand anything to do with the shooter’s suicide. Other incidents where armed personnel successfully engaged school shooters include but are certainly not limited to: the Umpqua Community College shooting in 2015, the FSU library shooting in 2014, The Reynolds High School Shooting in 2014 (interestingly, although some media neglected to report that the shooter had committed suicide after being engaged by police, this fact was included in Gordon A. Crews, Critical Examinations of School Violence and Disturbance in K-12 Education, 216), the Seattle Pacific University shooting in 2014 (the building monitor used pepper spray and a flying tackle to subdue the shooter while he was reloading), and the Santa Monica College shooting in 2013 where John Zawahri started a killing spree with his parents and then went to a college campus to shoot at passing cars. He was killed by responding officers.
It cannot be denied that armed security personnel in schools can stop school shootings. How about deterring the shootings? They're not going to deter a school shooting if their presence and effectiveness are little-known facts. If they were well-known facts, I think that would serve as a deterrent.

A common theme I found in researching the shootings listed above was the reticence of the articles I read to say anything about the shooter being neutralized by the police. Perhaps one thing that can be done in order to deter future school shootings would be for the media to give wall-to-wall coverage of school shooters getting shot by security personnel similar to the wall-to-wall coverage they give to mass shootings. Would-be shooters who see massive coverage of the grief following a shooting are encouraged to go out and cause more grief. Would-be shooters who saw enough footage of school-shooters being stopped by armed officers might decide to go somewhere other than a school to do their mass shootings.

My previously undiscovered method of deterring school shootings, therefore, is this: Find some way to persuade the media to give massive publicity to the officers who neutralize school shooters, thereby demonstrating to potential school shooters that there is little to be gained beyond a shortened life-expectancy by running amok in a school.

Sunday, March 18, 2018

MORE AMAZON REVIEWS OF "PRAIRIE DEFENDER"

Here are two more Amazon reviews of Prairie Defender:


DALE JONES


Shatters the myth that Lincoln was only a lawyer for the Illinois Central. The author, an experienced criminal law practitioner, provides a clear exposition of the practice of criminal law in general for laymen and explains well how criminal practitioners think about and try their cases. I practiced criminal law for 41+ years and came away impressed by both Lincoln and Mr.Dekle's analysis and insights.



«««««LINCOLN, FOR THE DEFENSE - EXCELLENT BOOK (February 8, 2018)

I've read 7 or 8 books on Lincoln's legal career in the past couple of years and I would put this right up there with my two favorites: Dirck's "Lincoln the Lawyer" and Steiner's "An Honest Calling." Except for a few instances, the details of each of the capital cases are fairly dry - especially considering what we see on the news every day n modern times - but the book is made exceptional for several reasons: a) colorful details of life on the Eighth Circuit that I had not seen before; b) exceptional expert insights from the author on trial strategies, cross-examination, criminal law procedure (period and modern) that I have not seen in any other book on Lincoln; c) rebuttals/corrections of received wisdom (actually, mostly myth) on Lincoln's part in some trials and d) an assessment of Lincoln's abilities as a criminal attorney. I borrowed this from the library but I am definitely adding to my own collection. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.

Tuesday, February 27, 2018

GEKOKUJO


I learned a new word the other day reading a book about an obscure battle fought between the Japanese and Russians on the eve of World War II—gekokujo. There had been a long-festering border dispute between Japan and Russia over an area near a place called Nomonhan. Japan’s Kwantung Army thought that the honorable thing to do was attack the Russians and drive them from the disputed land. Japan’s “Pentagon” said no. The Kwantung Army had been given a dishonorable order, so what did they do? They disobeyed it and attacked the Russians anyway. They had exercised the Japanese “prerogative” of gekokujo, or honorable insubordination. The Kwantung Army got clobbered by the Russians under the leadership of Georgy Zhukov, one of the few generals whom Stalin hadn’t killed in a recent purge.

There is a time and a place for gekokujo. Unfortunately for the Kwantung Army 1939 at Nomonhan was neither the time nor the place. In the wake of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting, Lt. Laz Ojeda of the Coral Springs Fire Department demonstrated the proper time and place for the exercise of gekokujo. Ordered to take a seriously injured shooting victim to a hospital 30 miles away, Ojeda didn’t think the victim would survive the trip. There was another hospital just 10 miles distant. He disobeyed the order to take the victim to the faraway hospital and took her to the nearby hospital. Attending physicians say that decision saved her life. SEE THE ARTICLE HERE.
There are now reports that the four deputies who did not enter the school during the shooting were obeying orders. They were told not to go into the scene unless they were wearing body cameras. SEE THE ARTICLE HERE. I don’t know if these reports are true or not. Time will tell. Assuming for the sake of argument that they were ordered not to enter the building while the shooting was going on, I think this would have been an excellent situation for the application of the Imperial Japanese Army’s principle of gekokujo.

I recall another mass shooting that occurred in Austin Texas the year I graduated from high school. Charles Whitman climbed to the top of a tower at the University of Texas at Austin and started shooting people on the campus. Two uniformed officers, Houston McCoy and Ramiro Martinez met at the foot of the tower. Acting without orders, they climbed it. Arriving at the top of the tower, they engaged the still-active gunman and killed him. Who knows what might have happened if they had checked with higher authorities before entering the tower. Might they have been told to stand down? Might they have disobeyed because they felt that in so doing they could save lives?

Tuesday, January 16, 2018

MORE ON TRANSCRIBING THE LINDBERGH KIDNAPPING CASE

I'm between books right now, just having finished revising my latest manuscript, Six Capsules: The Carlyle Harris Murder Case. This has given me time to work on a few other projects, including the transcribing of the 4,000 pages of testimony from the Lindbergh Kidnapping Case. Here are links to my most recent transcriptions:

WITNESS 15: JOSEPH ANTHONY PERRONE

WITNESS 16: JAMES J. O'BRIEN

WITNESS 17: MILTON GAGLIO

WITNESS 18: MAX ROSENHAIN

I'm coming up on a very important witness, John F. Condon (Witness 20), who served as the go-between for the delivery of the ransom from Lindbergh to "Cemetery John." Readers should find his testimony both interesting and entertaining. He was a real character.

Monday, January 15, 2018

AMAZON REVIEWS OF "PRAIRIE DEFENDER"

Here are two recent reviews of my book Prairie Defender: The Murder Trials of Abraham Lincoln that were posted on Amazon:

✭✭✭✭✭ LINCOLN'S MURDER TRIALS by R. Bull
George R. Dekle, Sr. relates all the stories about Lincoln's murder trials with the understanding of a seasoned attorney. HIs thirty years as an assistant state attorney of the Third Judicial Circuit of Florida gives him experience few can match. His research is thorough and his writing skills are top notch. He gives the reader the background quarrels that ended in tragedy and as much of the course of the trails as it is possible to know. An excellent book.

✭✭✭✭✭ I'VE READ A COUPLE OF HUNDRED LINCOLN BOOKS, AND THIS ... by Old Fart
I've read a couple hundred Lincoln books, and this one deserves a space on the bookshelf of every Lincoln scholar. It is well written enough to be of interest to the casual history reader and detailed and documented for those of us who want the citations. Most refreshing is the range of views of the skills of Lincoln as a lawyer, from mediocre to hagiography, and the integration of Lincoln's law practice, especially capital cases, in his political development.