Writing about Lane’s experience as a juror in one of my
cases put me to thinking about jury selection in general. Oftentimes the juror
who fits the stereotype for somebody you don’t want turns out to be your best
juror. For example, I was trying a first degree murder case years ago when a
prospective juror came into the box and said that he was opposed to the death
penalty on religious grounds. I asked
him the standard questions about being able to vote guilty and recommend the
death penalty despite his religious convictions, and he said that he could. I
believed him. “In other words,” I asked, “what you’re telling us is that you
can render unto Caesar?” He nodded his head and said “You got that right.” I
left him on the jury, and the defendant wound up going to Death Row. I don’t
recall if the recommendation was unanimous, so I don’t know if he voted for the
death penalty, but he voted guilty.
Another time I had a lady voice opposition to the death
penalty on religious grounds. She also answered the standard questions to my
liking, and I believed her. She was distraught when the jury returned with
their death recommendation, but she had done exactly what she said she could do—she
had voted to recommend death.
Then there was the time I had a lady voice strong opposition
to the death penalty, and she hung tough on the standard questions saying she
just couldn’t recommend the death penalty. The defense attorney took over
questioning and tried to wheedle her into saying that there were some
circumstances where she could vote to recommend death. “Can’t you think of any
circumstance at all where you would vote to recommend the death penalty?” he
asked. She thought a moment and said, yes, there was one situation where she
could recommend death. “And what’s that?” he asked. “If the defendant was a
serial killer.” Oops. In this particular case the defendant was a serial
killer. Defense counsel excused her.
I once had a prospective juror who actually participated in
a death row ministry and was on a first-name basis with a lot of death row
inmates. This would look like the last person that a prosecutor would want on
the jury in a capital murder case, but he answered the standard questions properly,
and I believed him. So did the defense attorney. He challenged the man off the
jury.
Then there was the capital murder case where the Public
Defender’s receptionist was called into the box. (The defendant had private
counsel). She answered all the questions correctly, and I wanted to believe her
but I was just a little nervous about keeping her on the jury. We took a recess
and I made a beeline for an assistant public defender friend of mine. I asked
him whether I should keep the lady on the jury, and he answered “I wouldn’t
want her on one of my juries.” The conviction with which he said those words
reassured me, I kept her on the jury, and I was not disappointed with the
outcome of the case.
I’ll close out this post by reminiscing about a couple of non-capital
case. We had just finished up a burglary case and the jury had retired when the
defense attorney came over to me and told me that I had messed up on voir dire.
I naturally wanted to know what he meant. “You kept my maid on the jury.” I
said that she’d committed perjury then, because I asked if anyone knew him. “No,”
he replied, “you forgot to ask that question.” I sweated bullets the whole time
the jury was out, but when they came back they had a unanimous guilty verdict.
I breathed a sigh of relief and resolved to quit “flying by the seat of my
pants” in voir dire. After that I wrote out a questions checklist for every
trial.
Then there was the time that we broke for lunch and the
defendant walked out into the parking lot with one of the jurors, got into the
car with him, and they drove to have lunch together. After lunch we put on a few
more witnesses and the jury retired to deliberate on their verdict. In short
order they came back with a unanimous verdict of guilty. I knew nothing about
this at the time. It wasn’t until years later that the defense attorney told me
about the incident, which he had witnessed.
No comments:
Post a Comment