CASE # 1: Bar fights were common back in the early 70’s when
I first began the practice of law, and a high percentage of my caseload
consisted of shootings and cuttings. The prosecutor had what I thought was an unreasonable attitude toward murder. If you killed someone, you were going to get prosecuted for first degree murder. The prosecutor's office seemed to adhere to the simple formula "Point the gun + Pull the trigger = Premeditation." I could usually get my clients convicted
of either manslaughter or second degree murder back in those days, but some of
them actually got off. Benjamin Franklin Coolidge was one who got off. It all
started at a dance hall which served liquor. Coolidge had gone there to have a
good time and dance with the pretty ladies. Trouble was, he was dancing with
the wrong lady. Her boyfriend began to try to pick a fight, and Coolidge
decided it was time to go home. When he went into the parking lot, he noticed
that the boyfriend had come out of the bar after him. Walking briskly to his
car, Coolidge walked around and opened the driver’s side door. This put his car
between him and the boyfriend. Coolidge could not possibly maneuver his car out
of its parking spot and onto the highway before the boyfriend was upon him. As
the boyfriend began to charge across the parking lot toward Coolidge, he
reached into the car and pulled out his sawed-off shotgun. Resting the gun on
the roof, he shot the boyfriend full in the chest. He then broke the shotgun
open, reloaded, and walked to stand over the body. “Somebody call the police,”
he ordered, “And the first one of you that tries to take the gun out of that
dead man’s hand will join him on the ground.” When the police arrived, the
deceased still had his pistol gripped firmly in his hand. Coolidge immediately
dropped his shotgun, held up his hands and told the police to be sure and get
the deceased’s gun. He was arrested on the spot, but the judge released him on
his own recognizance after a preliminary hearing. The only charge the state
filed was possession of a short barreled shotgun. If Coolidge’s barrel had only
been a half inch longer, he wouldn’t have been sentenced to prison.
CASE # 2: Basal McKinney considered himself a man’s man. He could
drink and fight with the best of them, and he wasn’t above shooting or stabbing
people. He had several bullets in his body, souvenirs of shooting scrapes he
had been in. The next-to-the last time he got shot, the bullet damaged his
spinal cord, rendering him a paraplegic. This injury somewhat cramped his style
for lying out in bars and fighting, so he retired to his singlewide trailer in
the deer woods, where he pursued his two hobbies of drinking himself senseless
and cursing people out on the CB radio. When he was sober he was an okay guy,
and most of the people in the vicinity liked him enough to put up with his CB
rants. One Saturday night as Josh Campbell drove his pickup through the woods,
he got into a CB conversation with McKinney. They bantered back and forth for
some time, with the language getting more and more explicit as the conversation
progressed. McKinney invited Campbell to his singlewide for a gunfight.
Campbell said okay, he’d be right over. Campbell thought it was just talk, but
McKinney was serious. McKinney got his sawed-off shotgun and wheeled down the
ramp to his driveway, where he took up a position awaiting Campbell. It wasn’t
long before Campbell pulled up in the driveway and saw McKinney sitting in his
wheelchair at the end. The next thing he saw was McKinney raising the shotgun
and shooting his windshield out. Campbell did several things at once. He threw
the car in reverse, floorboarded it, and returned fire with a 9 mm pistol. When
he had gotten a safe distance away, he stopped and called 911. He gave the
police a full statement, swearing that McKinney was his friend and that he
really thought McKinney was joking about the gunfight. I believed him. When we
got to McKinney’s singlewide, he was still sitting in the wheelchair right
where Campbell had first seen him, but he was dead. One of Campbell’s wild
shots had destroyed the femoral artery in McKinney’s left leg and he had bled
out. McKinney’s housemate had taken the shotgun and thrown it onto the roof of
the singlewide to try to make it look like Campbell had shot an unarmed man,
but we broke his story down and he finally told us where to find the shotgun.
Campbell took us up on our invitation to testify before the grand jury, and the
grand jury no-billed the case.
CASE # 3: Joe Schmo’s wife was unfaithful, and Joe was
unhappy. The boyfriend was a big, strong man, and Joe wasn’t. When Joe objected
to the affair, the boyfriend beat him up. I don’t recall what precipitated the
event, but one night the boyfriend came to Joe’s singlewide to beat him up
again. Frightened, Joe armed himself with a single-shot shotgun while his wife
admitted the boyfriend to the trailer. When Joe came out to the combination
kitchen/living room, he told the boyfriend to leave. The boyfriend picked up a
wine bottle off of the serving bar, got the bottle by the neck to use
as a club and approached Joe. Joe told the boyfriend not to come any closer.
The boyfriend raised the bottle threateningly and said “You don’t have the guts
to shoot.” The boyfriend was wrong. Joe immediately called 911. When I arrived
on the scene, Joe was standing on the front porch sobbing uncontrollably. The
boyfriend was lying on the living room floor with the bottle near his
outstretched hand, and the wife was taking a nap on the sofa not ten feet from
the body. The grand jury no-billed the case.
CASE # 4: Frank Leonard and Rebecca McGregor were happily
married newlyweds, but Rebecca’s ex-boyfriend was not happy. He stalked the
pair for some time, threatening them, making harassing phone calls, and
otherwise tormenting them. On the fatal evening, Frank and Rebecca were at home
in their singlewide trailer when the ex-boyfriend drove up and began pounding
on the front door, announcing his intent to kill Frank. Frank armed himself and
called 911. As the old saying goes, “When seconds matter, the police are just
minutes away.” Before the police arrived, the ex-boyfriend had broken out a
window and crawled into the house. As the ex-boyfriend approached Frank, he saw
that Frank was armed. “You don’t have the guts to shoot,” the ex-boyfriend
said. The ex-boyfriend was wrong. Frank
shot, and he shot more than once. When the ex-boyfriend fell to the floor, no
longer a threat, Frank immediately began administering first aid. He placed a
pillow under the ex-boyfriend’s head and did what he could to stop the
bleeding. It wasn’t enough. The ex-boyfriend was dead on arrival at the local
hospital. No charges were filed.
I could go on giving example after example of people who
acted in genuine self-defense, but I think you can see the pattern by now.
NOTE: I’ve handled several cases over the years where the
deceased’s last words were something to the effect that the killer didn’t have
the guts to shoot. This is a difference between real life and the movies. In
the movies, whenever the potential shootee tells a potential shooter that
he/she doesn’t have enough guts to shoot, the would-be shooter drops the gun
and begins to cry. In real life, if somebody points a gun at you, never tell
them they don’t have the guts to shoot.
Read both of your blog entries on Self Defense and the SYG law and agree with your conclusions. The portion of the law which troubles me the most is the section on: Use of force by aggressor: 776.041. A portion of this section states "The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
ReplyDelete(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
(2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
(a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant;..."
I can think of several hypothetical scenarios where the aggressor who has provoked another person and used force against the person could then if the tide changed so to speak use SYG as a defense, this doesn't seem just to me and would be interested in your thoughts and comments
The language you quote from the statute is in the identical language to a jury instruction which predated the SYG statute. Before SYG, the jury instruction read:
ReplyDelete"However, the use of force likely to cause death or great bodily harm is not justifiable if you find [defendant] was attempting co commit or committing [a forcible felony], or escaping after attempting to commit or committing [a forcible felony]; or
"[Defendant] initially provoked the use of force against [him][her]self, uless the force asserted toward the defendant was so great taht [he][she] reasonably believed that [he][she] was in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and had exhausted every reasonable means to escape the danger, other than using force likely to cause death or great bodily harm. ..."
What the language you quote does is to codify the preexisting law relevant to use of force by an aggressor, and make it specifically applicable to SYG situations.